NORTH AMERICA

Project Controls in North America

North American clients expect a CPM schedule that can survive a specification review. We build that logic, then keep the updates honest.

North America

CPM planning for United States and Canadian programmes

In North America the schedule is often a contract document. Specifications cite logic rules, constraints, calendars and narrative. A pretty Gantt chart that fails those tests is rejected, sometimes with the pay application.

We prepare baselines and updates that a reviewer can trace: open ends, lags, constraints and the critical path are checked before the file is issued. City and state detail for the United States is on the Planning and Scheduling USA page. Canadian programmes are also covered here and on the Canada location page.

Data centre, infrastructure, energy and commercial building programmes are the usual context. The reporting still has to land on a date the board understands.

When several states or provinces share one programme, weather windows and civic holidays must be separate calendars. Otherwise float is fictional and earned value drifts.

On the programme

What North American schedule reviews look for

Logic that stands up

Missing predecessors, negative lag and constraint-heavy files are the usual reasons a schedule is sent back. We clean those before submission.

Weather and holidays

Northern winters, hurricane seasons and different civic holidays belong on the calendar, not in a contingency bucket nobody can explain.

Narrative with the file

Reviewers expect a written account of the critical path, changes since last period and the basis of remaining duration.

Specification compliance

Owner specs often prescribe coding, float rules and update format. The baseline has to match those rules from day one.

How we help

How we support North American teams

Planning, scheduling and project controls from a Manchester-based consultancy, deployed to the programme rather than tied to a local office in every city.

Specification-ready baselines

Schedules structured for the CPM specification on the job, with coding the owner and the contractor can both filter.

Update discipline

Period updates that record progress, out-of-sequence work and the movement of the critical path.

Time impact work

When a change is alleged, we model it in the schedule rather than arguing from a spreadsheet of dates.

Dashboard reporting

A board view of SPI, CPI and milestone status that matches the live P6 network.

FAQ

North America planning questions

Is the United States covered in more detail elsewhere?

Yes. New York, Texas, California, Florida, Illinois and Washington each have a page under Planning and Scheduling USA.

Do you work on Canadian projects as well?

Yes. This regional page includes Canadian programmes, and the Canada location page covers winter calendars and cross-border supply in more detail.

Which schedule checks do you apply?

We review logic, constraints, lags, calendars, float and critical path, in line with the specification and with common recommended practices such as the DCMA 14-point assessment where the contract asks for it.

Can you support a US owner and an overseas designer on one file?

Yes. Coding and interface milestones keep both teams on the same network and the same data date.